Bill Gates is a charity or a hypocritical
Bill Gates is a charity or a hypocritical
http://www.06544.com
Bill - Gates returned to Harvard, accepted the award at Harvard University's "honorary Doctor of Laws" degree. Bill - Gates made a 25-minute speech, opening good sense of humor, he said: "Father, I have to say to you, I will return to Harvard to get his degree, and now I did. To this remark, I'll wait for for 30 years. "In 1973, Bill - Gates entered Harvard University Faculty of Law, was supposed to graduate in 1977, but in 1975, Bill - Gates take the initiative to drop out of school, give up the law, and friends founded Microsoft.
"Beijing News" Today there is a Qing Liu's article, "to see if Bill - Gates of hypocrisy", this article compares the detailed description of the Bill - Gates received honorary degree at Harvard, when the content of the speech. Bill - Gates said he was a student at Harvard when, not really aware of "the world there are striking inequalities - in health, wealth and opportunities of the appalling gap, making tens of thousands of people living in despair into. " This article's author, Liu Qing is my old friend of 20 years, the following quote is Liu Qing contents of this article:
"Thereafter, the entire speech is almost a declaration of egalitarianism. Dealt with in the world of poverty due to illness and death of countless children, Gates bitterly asked: 'how could the world let these children die?' Immediately, he gave out a radical left-wing is almost the standard answer: 'The answer is simple and brutal: the market does not encourage to save the lives of these children, and the Government is not to subsidize. The reason why these children die because their parents are not in the market force in the system had no say. 'the face of the presence of Harvard graduates, he cried out -' but we also have two '. "
"In his speech, the last, Gates called on the Harvard elite take on the responsibility of mankind. 'Our most distinguished minds, whether it should be committed to addressing our most serious problem? Whether Harvard professors should be encouraged to take the world's most serious inequality? Should Harvard students to understand the extent of global poverty, world hunger, the spread, are not in school girl, died of curable diseases that could have been the children? 'speech in such a passage at the end:' I look forward to Your evaluation of its own standards, not just personal and professional achievements, but also how you deal with the world's deepest weight inequality, how to deal with those living in remote, the other side of the world's people - they have no other in common with you Department, the only common is that they are also human beings'. "
I do not know "Look at Bill - Gates of hypocrisy" This title is set by the newspaper editor, or author given. Liu Qing's article also revealed a bit simple Bill - Gates, as "hypocrisy" of specific acts, the article writes: "This is a show, is putting on a show of words. Is not it? Bill - Gates is not the number of relying on monopoly, non-legitimate competition, and other means, became the world's richest man, do? Microsoft's global hegemony, not repression and destruction of the Third World's national IT industry, thus exacerbating the inequalities complained he had it? "Of course, Liu Qing brother in the article the last made a reconciliation, he wrote: "For the public, even if it is' hypocritical 'in public, but also better than' vicious' and plunder, was good for society. Besides, we heard the phrase clever lines, ' install it, installation is really a lifetime '. "
The article as "leftist", "right" set of criteria to measure the behavior of the world's richest charity, the premise is still the default is "greedy capitalists" and "capital is cruel," such a concept, so it is easy to get a charitable deduction may be hypocritical. Indeed, on many occasions, this reasoning is correct. Not long ago, my article, "Olympic champion had been cheated by whom? , "Seems to also be used as such" hypocrisy "of the Chinese replica. Liu Qing brother The title of this article the term is uncertain, the narrative in the article did not quite sure, Bill - Gates identified as "hypocrisy", but use a number sentence to ask in order to cause people to reflect . The article concluded by saying that, even hypocritical, but also better than the looting. For this emerged from Bill - Gates Is not "hypocrisy" of the entanglement.
I looked at this article on-line comments, most people do not agree that "hypocrisy" of this title and conclusions, because the inclination of the article is still very evident. Although the author a little bit careful to avoid falling into the trap, but still very easy to be identified, the authors mean that the say Bill - Gates is hypocritical. Well, for Bill - Gates's charitable work, really be able to use the "hypocrisy" to sum up do?
Recalling Bill - Gates 30 years of the development process, some small things does seem to prove Bill - Gates has the greed, mean, cunning, and even hypocritical. We know that Bill - Gates did not start business after graduating from Harvard, but it was Bill - Gates is a passive, than he teenage Paul - Allen, drop out of school the principal founder and promoter of entrepreneurship. However, the two companies first formed when the equity ratio is 6:4, Bill - Gates accounted for the bulk. A general point of view, the equity ratio is in accordance with the code written in both the number of their respective decisions. However, the American writer Gary - Mr Rivlin pointed out, Bill - Gates did adhere to the accounting rates 46 on the grounds that Allen are picking up as early as 6 months salary, and that he is from Harvard dropping out of school, Allen is a dropout from Washington State University Therefore, the loss of more than Alan Gates huge, so Gates should be too much of some. The American writer commented that, Allen's soft-hearted moment, so he agreed with the Bill - Gates of the unequal treaties, lost the chance to become the world's richest man, at least reduce profit by 150 billion dollars. This argument is also from the side witnessed the Bill - Gates is indeed a person for the monetary shenanigans.
Bill - Gates took to the road of philanthropists, active and passive components in the end to which a larger, perhaps not easy to clear. In 1997, CNN founder Ted - Turner announced its contribution of 1 billion U.S. dollars to the United Nations, the money is about one-third of all the property the original Turner also was the world within the largest donation ever man lifetime contributions, a figure at that time is definitely a very eye-catching figure. Turner donated large sums of money this time, Bill - Gates of net assets owned by Turner more than 10 times, but the total number of charitable donations is only one-tenth of Turner. Then Bill - Gates, was concerned about his luxurious mansion fully automatic, as well as being turbulent, for Microsoft's monopoly charges.
Ironically, Turner is not the first one Bill - Gates stingy, mean people, simply because one billion U.S. dollars is too bright, immediately Bill - Gates was a miser's image stand out. This situation is somewhat similar to a few years ago, someone in China has also carried out a charitable billionaires list, so that China's richest were also a comparison with each other to identify what.
For Turner, he donated one billion U.S. dollars, obtaining a great good reputation, but also for his follow-up in exchange for huge gains. AOL was Microsoft's competitors, in Turner's plan, America Online bought Time Warner. The case of this large-scale mergers and acquisitions, the biggest beneficiary is the Turner. To know at the time Microsoft is stuck in the antitrust lawsuit being, while America Online and Time Warner formed a new trust actually be able to successfully cross the border, which is Turner's brilliant move by the charity in exchange for one of the benefits. The immediate benefits. Australian news magnate Rupert Murdoch has long been Turner's arch rival, Turner and even openly Murdoch to Hitler, when Turner's price and Murdoch similar. However, Turner donated 1 billion U.S. dollars in less than four years, he's worth had risen to 9 billion U.S. dollars, and more than Murdoch's deadly foe.
Turner to shock the world to donate 1 billion U.S. dollars of the move, for the Bill - Gates, how much influence does not seem to a lot of people pay attention. Turner announced a donation of one billion U.S. dollars, the Bill - Gates immediately become the focus of media attention. A few months later, Bill - Gates In an interview with ABC interview, said: "I am very pleased that he donated one billion U.S. dollars, my donation would not lose him, but also more than him." Turner announced the donation at 1 billion U.S. dollars went to the first anniversary of the difference two days, when in September 1998, Bill - Gates to donate the largest individual donation first 10 billion dollars.
As of today, Bill - Gates to donate to charity far more than Turner, but also far more than anyone in the world has become without doubt the greatest philanthropist. However, Bill - Gates, Turner, like then, like the good reputation from his charity have continuing access to a potentially enormous benefits. Bill - Gates's personal wealth is not reduced because of large contributions, but more and more, it is now almost twice as much when in 1997. Turner's not taboo to say: I have more good things come in more money. California a millionaire, said he spent on charity in exchange for every dollar can be 1.1-2 U.S. dollars in return. He may or may not donate the money to earn back the name of the idea, but has donated to earn, is a definite pattern. There is an American added: "I know the greatest sense of satisfaction than secretly doing good, let someone else accidentally discovered."
"If we do something of unnamed" and "not asking for anything" is a virtue in ancient China to modern to become one of the core spirit of Lei Feng. So, these rich flame of charity, which acts contrary to the spirit of Lei Feng, this was a charitable act such havoc, if we can come to these charities are "hypocrisy" of the conclusion? Bill - Gates in the end is a charity, or hypocrisy? Went on to say tomorrow. Tomorrow the article simple tips: a small act of charity that is rich in the personal ads, that is how big the proper exercise of social power.
http://www.06544.com
Bill - Gates returned to Harvard, accepted the award at Harvard University's "honorary Doctor of Laws" degree. Bill - Gates made a 25-minute speech, opening good sense of humor, he said: "Father, I have to say to you, I will return to Harvard to get his degree, and now I did. To this remark, I'll wait for for 30 years. "In 1973, Bill - Gates entered Harvard University Faculty of Law, was supposed to graduate in 1977, but in 1975, Bill - Gates take the initiative to drop out of school, give up the law, and friends founded Microsoft.
"Beijing News" Today there is a Qing Liu's article, "to see if Bill - Gates of hypocrisy", this article compares the detailed description of the Bill - Gates received honorary degree at Harvard, when the content of the speech. Bill - Gates said he was a student at Harvard when, not really aware of "the world there are striking inequalities - in health, wealth and opportunities of the appalling gap, making tens of thousands of people living in despair into. " This article's author, Liu Qing is my old friend of 20 years, the following quote is Liu Qing contents of this article:
"Thereafter, the entire speech is almost a declaration of egalitarianism. Dealt with in the world of poverty due to illness and death of countless children, Gates bitterly asked: 'how could the world let these children die?' Immediately, he gave out a radical left-wing is almost the standard answer: 'The answer is simple and brutal: the market does not encourage to save the lives of these children, and the Government is not to subsidize. The reason why these children die because their parents are not in the market force in the system had no say. 'the face of the presence of Harvard graduates, he cried out -' but we also have two '. "
"In his speech, the last, Gates called on the Harvard elite take on the responsibility of mankind. 'Our most distinguished minds, whether it should be committed to addressing our most serious problem? Whether Harvard professors should be encouraged to take the world's most serious inequality? Should Harvard students to understand the extent of global poverty, world hunger, the spread, are not in school girl, died of curable diseases that could have been the children? 'speech in such a passage at the end:' I look forward to Your evaluation of its own standards, not just personal and professional achievements, but also how you deal with the world's deepest weight inequality, how to deal with those living in remote, the other side of the world's people - they have no other in common with you Department, the only common is that they are also human beings'. "
I do not know "Look at Bill - Gates of hypocrisy" This title is set by the newspaper editor, or author given. Liu Qing's article also revealed a bit simple Bill - Gates, as "hypocrisy" of specific acts, the article writes: "This is a show, is putting on a show of words. Is not it? Bill - Gates is not the number of relying on monopoly, non-legitimate competition, and other means, became the world's richest man, do? Microsoft's global hegemony, not repression and destruction of the Third World's national IT industry, thus exacerbating the inequalities complained he had it? "Of course, Liu Qing brother in the article the last made a reconciliation, he wrote: "For the public, even if it is' hypocritical 'in public, but also better than' vicious' and plunder, was good for society. Besides, we heard the phrase clever lines, ' install it, installation is really a lifetime '. "
The article as "leftist", "right" set of criteria to measure the behavior of the world's richest charity, the premise is still the default is "greedy capitalists" and "capital is cruel," such a concept, so it is easy to get a charitable deduction may be hypocritical. Indeed, on many occasions, this reasoning is correct. Not long ago, my article, "Olympic champion had been cheated by whom? , "Seems to also be used as such" hypocrisy "of the Chinese replica. Liu Qing brother The title of this article the term is uncertain, the narrative in the article did not quite sure, Bill - Gates identified as "hypocrisy", but use a number sentence to ask in order to cause people to reflect . The article concluded by saying that, even hypocritical, but also better than the looting. For this emerged from Bill - Gates Is not "hypocrisy" of the entanglement.
I looked at this article on-line comments, most people do not agree that "hypocrisy" of this title and conclusions, because the inclination of the article is still very evident. Although the author a little bit careful to avoid falling into the trap, but still very easy to be identified, the authors mean that the say Bill - Gates is hypocritical. Well, for Bill - Gates's charitable work, really be able to use the "hypocrisy" to sum up do?
Recalling Bill - Gates 30 years of the development process, some small things does seem to prove Bill - Gates has the greed, mean, cunning, and even hypocritical. We know that Bill - Gates did not start business after graduating from Harvard, but it was Bill - Gates is a passive, than he teenage Paul - Allen, drop out of school the principal founder and promoter of entrepreneurship. However, the two companies first formed when the equity ratio is 6:4, Bill - Gates accounted for the bulk. A general point of view, the equity ratio is in accordance with the code written in both the number of their respective decisions. However, the American writer Gary - Mr Rivlin pointed out, Bill - Gates did adhere to the accounting rates 46 on the grounds that Allen are picking up as early as 6 months salary, and that he is from Harvard dropping out of school, Allen is a dropout from Washington State University Therefore, the loss of more than Alan Gates huge, so Gates should be too much of some. The American writer commented that, Allen's soft-hearted moment, so he agreed with the Bill - Gates of the unequal treaties, lost the chance to become the world's richest man, at least reduce profit by 150 billion dollars. This argument is also from the side witnessed the Bill - Gates is indeed a person for the monetary shenanigans.
Bill - Gates took to the road of philanthropists, active and passive components in the end to which a larger, perhaps not easy to clear. In 1997, CNN founder Ted - Turner announced its contribution of 1 billion U.S. dollars to the United Nations, the money is about one-third of all the property the original Turner also was the world within the largest donation ever man lifetime contributions, a figure at that time is definitely a very eye-catching figure. Turner donated large sums of money this time, Bill - Gates of net assets owned by Turner more than 10 times, but the total number of charitable donations is only one-tenth of Turner. Then Bill - Gates, was concerned about his luxurious mansion fully automatic, as well as being turbulent, for Microsoft's monopoly charges.
Ironically, Turner is not the first one Bill - Gates stingy, mean people, simply because one billion U.S. dollars is too bright, immediately Bill - Gates was a miser's image stand out. This situation is somewhat similar to a few years ago, someone in China has also carried out a charitable billionaires list, so that China's richest were also a comparison with each other to identify what.
For Turner, he donated one billion U.S. dollars, obtaining a great good reputation, but also for his follow-up in exchange for huge gains. AOL was Microsoft's competitors, in Turner's plan, America Online bought Time Warner. The case of this large-scale mergers and acquisitions, the biggest beneficiary is the Turner. To know at the time Microsoft is stuck in the antitrust lawsuit being, while America Online and Time Warner formed a new trust actually be able to successfully cross the border, which is Turner's brilliant move by the charity in exchange for one of the benefits. The immediate benefits. Australian news magnate Rupert Murdoch has long been Turner's arch rival, Turner and even openly Murdoch to Hitler, when Turner's price and Murdoch similar. However, Turner donated 1 billion U.S. dollars in less than four years, he's worth had risen to 9 billion U.S. dollars, and more than Murdoch's deadly foe.
Turner to shock the world to donate 1 billion U.S. dollars of the move, for the Bill - Gates, how much influence does not seem to a lot of people pay attention. Turner announced a donation of one billion U.S. dollars, the Bill - Gates immediately become the focus of media attention. A few months later, Bill - Gates In an interview with ABC interview, said: "I am very pleased that he donated one billion U.S. dollars, my donation would not lose him, but also more than him." Turner announced the donation at 1 billion U.S. dollars went to the first anniversary of the difference two days, when in September 1998, Bill - Gates to donate the largest individual donation first 10 billion dollars.
As of today, Bill - Gates to donate to charity far more than Turner, but also far more than anyone in the world has become without doubt the greatest philanthropist. However, Bill - Gates, Turner, like then, like the good reputation from his charity have continuing access to a potentially enormous benefits. Bill - Gates's personal wealth is not reduced because of large contributions, but more and more, it is now almost twice as much when in 1997. Turner's not taboo to say: I have more good things come in more money. California a millionaire, said he spent on charity in exchange for every dollar can be 1.1-2 U.S. dollars in return. He may or may not donate the money to earn back the name of the idea, but has donated to earn, is a definite pattern. There is an American added: "I know the greatest sense of satisfaction than secretly doing good, let someone else accidentally discovered."
"If we do something of unnamed" and "not asking for anything" is a virtue in ancient China to modern to become one of the core spirit of Lei Feng. So, these rich flame of charity, which acts contrary to the spirit of Lei Feng, this was a charitable act such havoc, if we can come to these charities are "hypocrisy" of the conclusion? Bill - Gates in the end is a charity, or hypocrisy? Went on to say tomorrow. Tomorrow the article simple tips: a small act of charity that is rich in the personal ads, that is how big the proper exercise of social power.